El ángel exterminador

In 1962, Mexican director Luis Buñuel released his surrealist masterpiece "El ángel exterminador" (The Exterminating Angel), a film that defied traditional narrative structures and challenged societal norms. The movie follows a group of high society guests who become trapped in a luxurious mansion after a dinner party, unable to leave for mysterious reasons. As their situation becomes increasingly absurd and chaotic, the veneer of civilization disintegrates, revealing their true animalistic nature.

Buñuel's film is a meditation on the human condition, an exploration of the fragility of social norms and the veneer of civilization that we all wear. It is a biting satire of the upper class, exposing their hypocrisy, selfishness, and cruelty. Through surreal imagery, dark humor, and biting commentary, Buñuel creates a cinematic experience that is both fascinating and unsettling.

In this blog post, we will delve into the world of "El ángel exterminador," exploring its themes, symbols, and cultural significance. We will examine how Buñuel used the film to comment on Mexican society and the world at large, and how its impact continues to resonate today. From its controversial reception in Mexico to its enduring legacy in the world of cinema, we will explore all aspects of this iconic film.

Join us as we take a deep dive into the mysterious and captivating world of "El ángel exterminador," and discover why it remains a timeless classic of cinema. From its surreal imagery to its biting commentary, this film will challenge your perceptions of society and leave you questioning the very nature of humanity.

I'm sure you will also enjoy the following films:

TitleRelease YearDirectorIMDB Rating
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie1972Luis Buñuel8.0
The Exterminating Angel (El ángel exterminador) (Remake)2002Luis Buñuel7.5
The Skin I Live In2011Pedro Almodóvar7.6
Dogtooth (Kynodontas)2009Yorgos Lanthimos7.3
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom (Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma)1975Pier Paolo Pasolini6.5

"The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" is a classic film directed by Luis Buñuel and released in 1972. This surreal comedy follows the lives of a group of upper-class individuals as they attempt to have a dinner party, but are continuously thwarted by various obstacles and bizarre occurrences.

Plot and Summary

The movie starts with a group of friends who plan to have dinner together. However, they are continuously interrupted by various events, including the sudden appearance of a military officer, a terrorist attack, and even a dream sequence. As the night goes on, their attempts to have a simple dinner become more and more absurd, and the lines between reality and fantasy begin to blur.


One of the strengths of "The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" is its use of surrealism. The movie is filled with unexpected events and dreamlike sequences that keep the audience engaged and entertained. Additionally, the film's commentary on the upper class is both humorous and insightful, poking fun at their pretensions and exposing their faults.

The movie's cast is also noteworthy, featuring a talented ensemble of actors who deliver strong performances. The chemistry between the characters is palpable, and their interactions add to the movie's humor and charm.

One weakness of the film, however, is its pacing. At times, the movie can feel slow, with scenes that drag on longer than necessary. Additionally, the film's surrealism may not be to everyone's taste, and some viewers may find it confusing or off-putting.

Overall, "The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" is a unique and entertaining film that showcases Buñuel's skill as a director. Its use of surrealism and strong cast make it a must-see for fans of classic cinema.

As a movie buff with a keen eye for directing and cinematography, I recently watched the 2002 remake of "The Exterminating Angel (El ángel exterminador)" and boy, was it a ride!

Plot summary:

The movie revolves around a group of wealthy guests attending a dinner party at a mansion. However, after the meal, they find themselves unable to leave the room they are in, despite there being no physical barriers preventing them from doing so. As days go by, the guests become increasingly desperate, dealing with hunger, thirst, and even death, all while trying to figure out why they are trapped.


The movie is definitely not for everyone, but it's an artistic masterpiece that leaves a lasting impression on the viewer. The surreal and bizarre elements of the film keep you on the edge of your seat, wondering what will happen next. The director, Luis Buñuel, is a master at creating a sense of unease and tension throughout the movie.

Strong points:

The acting in the film is top-notch, with a talented cast that brings each character to life. The cinematography is also outstanding, with many shots that are visually stunning and impactful. The film's score also adds to the movie's eerie and unsettling atmosphere.

Weak points:

One weak point of the film is that it may be too bizarre for some viewers, making it difficult to understand or enjoy. Additionally, the movie may be slow-paced for some, as it takes its time to build up the tension and mystery.

Personal opinion:

Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed the 2002 remake of "The Exterminating Angel (El ángel exterminador)." The film's artistic style and unique story kept me engaged from beginning to end. The strong acting and cinematography were also a highlight for me. While it may not be for everyone, I highly recommend this film for anyone who enjoys surreal and thought-provoking movies.


- Plot summary
- Impressions
- Strong points
- Weak points
- Personal opinion

The Skin I Live In: A Dark and Twisted Tale of Revenge

The Skin I Live In is a 2011 Spanish thriller film that tells the story of a plastic surgeon named Dr. Robert Ledgard, who is obsessed with creating a new type of synthetic skin. The doctor's obsession stems from a personal tragedy that he experienced, which involved the rape and suicide of his wife. As the plot unfolds, we learn that Dr. Ledgard's experimentation with skin grafts involves using a young woman as his test subject. The film is a dark and twisted tale of revenge that is sure to keep you on the edge of your seat.

Plot and Summary

The plot of The Skin I Live In is complex and multi-layered, but at its core, it is a story about obsession and revenge. Dr. Ledgard has created a new type of synthetic skin that is resistant to burns and other types of damage. He has used his knowledge to create a new type of skin that he believes will help him to avenge the rape and suicide of his wife. The doctor's test subject is a young woman named Vera, who is being held captive in his laboratory.

As the story progresses, we learn more about Dr. Ledgard's past and his motivations. We also learn more about Vera and the circumstances that led to her captivity. The film is filled with twists and turns, and the ending is particularly shocking.

Strong Points

The Skin I Live In is a well-crafted film that is beautifully shot and expertly directed. The cinematography is stunning, and the use of color and light is particularly effective. The performances of the cast are also impressive, particularly that of Antonio Banderas, who delivers a chilling portrayal of Dr. Ledgard.

Weak Points

While the film is undoubtedly well-made, it is also quite disturbing and unsettling. Some viewers may find the subject matter to be too dark or uncomfortable, and there are moments in the film that are quite graphic.

What Makes this Movie Special?

The Skin I Live In is a unique and thought-provoking film that explores complex themes such as identity, revenge, and the pursuit of perfection. It is a film that will stay with you long after the credits roll, and it is a testament to the power of cinema to challenge and engage its audience.

Cast and Personal Opinion

The cast of The Skin I Live In is exceptional, with Antonio Banderas delivering one of the best performances of his career. Elena Anaya, who plays Vera, is also excellent, and she brings depth and nuance to her portrayal of the doctor's test subject.

Overall, I would highly recommend The Skin I Live In to anyone who is looking for a thought-provoking and engaging thriller. While it is not a film for the faint of heart, it is a powerful and well-made work of cinema that is sure to leave a lasting impression.

Dogtooth (Kynodontas) is a Greek film that was released in 2009. Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, this movie is as bizarre as it is intriguing. The movie tells the story of a family that has isolated themselves from the rest of the world. The parents have created their own language, and they have taught their children that the outside world is dangerous and that they will be harmed if they leave their compound.

Plot Summary

The movie begins with the father of the family telling his wife and children a story about a cat that has been killed by a dog. The story serves as a metaphor for how the family operates. The parents have complete control over their children, and they use fear to keep them in line. The children are not allowed to leave the compound, and they have been taught that certain words and actions are dangerous.

As the movie progresses, we see the eldest daughter begin to rebel against her parents. She starts to question their rules and wants to learn more about the outside world. This leads to a series of events that change the family dynamic forever.


This movie is not for everyone. It is strange and unsettling, and it will leave you with a lot of questions. However, if you are open to unconventional storytelling and enjoy movies that challenge your perceptions, then this movie is a must-see.

One of the strongest aspects of the movie is the acting. The cast is excellent, and they do a fantastic job of bringing the characters to life. The parents are especially impressive, as they are both terrifying and sympathetic at the same time.

Another strong point is the cinematography. The movie is shot in a way that adds to the overall feeling of unease. The use of close-ups and slow-motion shots creates a sense of claustrophobia and tension that is palpable.

Weak Points

One of the weaknesses of the movie is that it can be hard to follow at times. The story is intentionally vague, and it can be difficult to understand what is happening on screen. This can be frustrating for some viewers, especially those who prefer more straightforward storytelling.

Another weakness is that the movie is very dark. It deals with themes of abuse, isolation, and control, and it can be hard to watch at times. This is not a movie that you would want to watch if you are looking for something light and uplifting.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, Dogtooth (Kynodontas) is a unique and challenging movie that will stay with you long after the credits roll. It is not a movie for everyone, but if you are willing to take a chance on it, you will be rewarded with a thought-provoking and unforgettable cinematic experience.

If you're looking for a movie that will shock you to your core, then "Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom" is the film for you. This Italian-French film, directed by Pier Paolo Pasolini, is not for the faint of heart, as it dives deep into the darkest aspects of human nature.

Summary and Plot

The film is set in the Italian town of Salo during the final days of World War II. Four wealthy, powerful men - the Duke, the Bishop, the Magistrate, and the President - kidnap a group of young boys and girls and take them to a secluded mansion. There, they subject them to a series of increasingly depraved and sadistic acts, including rape, torture, and murder. The film ends with the children being killed off one by one, and the four men being arrested by the fascist government.


The first thing that struck me about this film was its unflinching portrayal of violence and cruelty. The scenes of sexual abuse and torture are brutal and often difficult to watch, and the film doesn't shy away from depicting them in all their horror. At the same time, however, the film is also deeply philosophical, exploring themes of power, corruption, and the nature of evil. The four men who perpetrate these atrocities are not mere monsters, but complex characters with their own motivations and desires.

Strong Points

One of the strongest aspects of the film is its cinematography. Pasolini makes use of long takes and wide shots to create a sense of detachment and objectivity, as if we are watching the events unfold from a distance. The film's use of color and lighting is also striking, with each scene imbued with a different mood and atmosphere. The performances, especially from the four leads, are all excellent, with each actor bringing a unique energy and presence to their role.

Weak Points

The film's graphic content will undoubtedly be a turn-off for many viewers, and it's not hard to see why. The scenes of violence and sexual abuse are intense and disturbing, and there's a real risk of the film coming across as exploitative or sensationalist. Additionally, the film's pacing can be slow at times, with long stretches of dialogue and little action.


In the end, "Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom" is a difficult, challenging film that will not be to everyone's taste. However, for those willing to brave its horrors, it offers a powerful, thought-provoking exploration of the darkest aspects of human nature. Pasolini's direction is masterful, the cinematography is stunning, and the performances are all top-notch. This is a film that will stay with you long after the credits roll.